1% of Big Society is a good thing

Much has been made of volunteering in the Coalition Big Society. Probably best described as confusion on how it is funded through plundered ‘dormant’ bank accounts, to how we are all supposed to find the time to volunteer to run this country whilst the politicians work out a way to pay back money “we” have borrowed. Culminating in a relieved glee that even the dude assigned to voluntarily oversee this, Lord Wei, couldn’t hack it and was off to make some cash and spend time in the real world.

I have to admit that the half an eye I was keeping on this was basically relieved that I was not still expected to set up a local school in my spare time; most people I knew had no idea what the Big Society idea was – still – but revelled in the Wei irony anywei.

However, a funny thing happened on my way to Tescos. Whilst regaling my family about this apparent nail in the coffin of Big Society, I started thinking about how the Big Idea had actually properly affected me. How I had actually become more aware of my civic duty. How I did actually realise that although it had been a big government theory that couldn’t possibly work – it had made me more aware of my own responsibility as a person living and working in a struggling country. I had actually changed a bit of my behaviour. I was more aware of those around me. Through Martha Lane-Fox’s constant cry to help those with no digital experience get online so that they could benefit in some small way (digital being my field I widened my horizons… to my elderly neighbour who is hugely active in our local community but can’t work her computer, to my daughters’ schools who struggled with teaching IT), also to my own business in Rewired State, how we could continue our fight for a transparent society into perhaps helping coders of a different generation understand simple things they could do to support this in the large perceived evil organisations they had given their careers to. I am definitely more aware of my very local community, in a tiny way, but does that matter?

Then an even more inconsequential thing happened. I was reading a book where someone volunteered to help on a crime – yes it was a novel and one of those designed to help you sleep well by providing nice short chapters – nevertheless I had a lightbulb moment when I realised that we all sacrifice a bit of our lives to help others anyway, most of the time without thinking.

I have no idea why this sentence in a made up bit of prose nudged my silly brain into a very small realisation, but it did, and the realisation is this: big, brave government statements/policies, that seem to carry an ambition way beyond the reality a democratic society can deliver, are perhaps not actually meant to be delivered as reality. Sometimes, perhaps, the point is to cause disruption, to cause people to cry “Impossible”, to make people work to disprove the theory. If only 1% of those change their behaviour – even if they are completely unaware of doing so, then life may become a little easier for a number of other people, who may then change their behaviour – and so on.

Then I saw how actually irrelevant it was that Lord Wei had said or done anything – I did not know who he was before today anyway but I knew of Big Society ambitions. The point is that some of us are thinking differently, and those few will affect a few who will affect a few &c &c. It’s not going to win a war or make a massive PR-able difference, but it will change a significant number of daily lives. And that is worth it.

8 responses

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention 1% of Big Society is a good thing | Emma Mulqueeny -- Topsy.com

  2. The current economic climate means that most people are being forced out of their habits.

    People are unable to reward themselves shopping for a new outfit. They have to cut back on the holidays, loose the football season ticket, buy fewer xbox games, downsize the CD collection, cut out movie night, eat out less, stay with the same car this year, etc.

    This is bad for the economy, but great for the Big Society…Volunteering is free.

    BUT, habits are hard to break and society wants a string economy!

    Most people will buy half an outfit, holiday in the UK, only go to home matches, hire games from blockbuster, buy singles on iTunes, rent a DVD, get a take out, buy a second hand car…

    Volunteering is easy, you don’t have to think about it. You go do it.

    You don’t need to find the thing to do…It will find you if you are the type of person that volunteers. And it doesn’t mean you have to change your lifestyle or loose time…

    You can donate clothes you don’t wear to a charity shop.

    You can spend some of your holiday on a community building project, drive a variety club mini-bus, take disadvantaged children to the country.

    You can join you local community football club, teach youngsters or simply run the accounts.

    You can go to your local community centre or foyer centre for the homeless and play team xbox games with the people there.

    You can sell your music on ebay and give the money to comic relief.

    You can start a movie club at your local school or college, serve food to the homeless at a respite centre, use your car to deliver meals on wheel to the elderly.

    Or you can just think about it, as not everyone gains the same rewards from volunteering.

    Habits are all about reward.

  3. The question, though, in terms of political context, is “how much of this was happening anyway?” — that is, is the coalition “Big Society” initiative a matter of riding on the coattails of people getting narked with the status quo and getting on to do stuff already?

    • Oh totally, yes, you are indeed right. Social entrepreneurs and the like were around for a long time before the Coalition was formed, and we were responding to the economic crisis by being more socially aware. SO yes, Big Society was already happening. I think Ivo Gormley’s film: Us Now http://www.usnowfilm.com actually depicts it very well, and Ivo did that a few years ago. So yes – I guess it was not so much a new policy as a projection of what was already happening in society, and perhaps that is why it has ‘failed’ – you can’t take a movement already happening and claim political capital on making it happen. Have I completely countered everything I said in my post? Maybe… interesting though

      • No, I don’t think you’ve countered what you wrote, I think you’ve built on it actually.

        I probably had a similar moment reading your post, as you did reading the novel. Sure things were already happening but by giving it a name, and a preposterously overblown ambition there is a moment where you both become more aware of what was already doing, what you were already doing, as well as what you weren’t doing. I can’t start a school in my spare time either but the reaction against that moves quickly to having to think about what I could do and comparing it to what I am doing…as you wrote, the thinking about it emphasises the possible.

  4. Pingback: Links 7/2/2011: FOSDEM 2011 Closing, GNOME 3 Test Day | Techrights

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: